TG Telegram Group Link
Channel: TomBen’s Web Excursions
Back to Bottom
不明白播客 第 82 期 提到了一个概念——杯水主义。维基百科介绍道,杯水主义认为爱情是不存在的,男女之间的关系可以简化为一种本能的性需求,这种需求必须在没有任何「条件」的情况下得到满足,就像喝水解渴一样。一般认为,杯水主义的提出者是苏联女性革命家亚历山德拉·柯伦泰。The satisfaction of one’s sexual desires should be as simple as getting a glass of water, often attributed to Alexandra Kollontay.

上图是几本书中关于「杯水主义」的内容:

P. 1:列宁反对杯水主义。来源:Stites, Richard. 1978. The Women’s Liberation Movement in Russia: Feminism, Nihilsm, and Bolshevism, 1860–1930. Expanded Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400843275.
P. 2:中央苏区革命时期,杯水主义盛行,导致男女关系混乱。来源:黄道炫. 2011. 张力与限界:中央苏区的革命(1933~1934). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. https://book.douban.com/subject/6984992/.
P. 3:延安时期,杯水主义逐渐消失,而代之以干部级别为基础的、由领导介绍批准的婚姻制度。来源:高華. 2000. 紅太陽是怎樣升起的——延安整風運動的來龍去脈. 香港: 香港中文大學出版社. https://cup.cuhk.edu.hk/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=2307
P. 4:普通中国人对性讳莫如深,但高干子弟对性相当开放。来源:孙隆基. 1983. 中国文化的深层结构:奴化的人. 香港: 集贤社. https://book.douban.com/subject/1965857/.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The World Before Git

In this post, we trace the history of VCS, leading up to the creation of Git.

The Earliest Forms of VCS: Manual

https://osshistory.org/p/the-world-before-git
Involuntary Consent: The Illusion of Choice in Japan’s Adult Video Industry

“Involuntary consent” is ubiquitous, not only in the porn industry, but in our everyday lives. And yet modern society, built on beliefs of autonomy, free choice, and equality, renders it all but invisible.

Akiko Takeyama investigates the paradox of involuntary consent in modern liberal democratic societies. Taking consent as her starting point, Takeyama illustrates the nuances of contract making and the legal structures, or lack thereof, that govern Japan’s adult video and sex entertainment industries.

https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=33461
Earning respect and trust

If anything, the challenges that science is experiencing now are not due to a lack of success in the laboratory. They are due to a lack of emphasis on other aspects of science—great teaching; communicating; policy-making; and performing the hard intellectual labor of choosing, from the mass of research, those discoveries that deserve publication in a top journal—and then working with authors to make the findings publishable.

I was frequently visited by graduate students who were in distress after they had informed their adviser that they did not intend to pursue an academic research career. Suddenly, their adviser became less interested in them.

Many seem to think that having highly cited work and membership in exclusive academies gives them license to be dismissive of others. This is pure arrogance and ignorance.

The way to restore trust in science and higher education is by earning it. Let’s start by recognizing everyone within the scientific community as peers in the scientific quest.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado3040
HTML Embed Code:
2024/05/01 20:40:51
Back to Top