Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /var/www/hottg/post.php on line 59

Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/2025-07-22/post/cryptonarratives1/--): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/hottg/post.php on line 72
I setup a long BTC / short alts strategy on a small sub-account as an experiment and it looked like that @Crypto Narratives
TG Telegram Group & Channel
Crypto Narratives | United States America (US)
Create: Update:

I setup a long BTC / short alts strategy on a small sub-account as an experiment and it looked like that

- Long BTC leg around 2x larger than the shorts => I started with 1.5x but that's clearly too low imo

- Short more than 100 alts (so very diluted shorts), with almost all of them being sub $1bn FDV

- I doubled down on some of the shorts when the alts started moving up in early May, which is probably not a good idea because I often doubled down way too early on altcoins that ended up being the top performers (ex: GOAT, PENGU, PNUT). This means that the shorts with the most size were also the shorts pumping the most, increasing the negative uPnL a lot on these.

- This previous point leads me to think that keeping equal size (or close to) on most shorts and not adding on the ones that pumped the most is probably a better strategy. Losers remain losers.

- You can see that the drawdown in May was pretty brutal, but it's been very smooth since then. Finding how to reduce this drawdown is key.

Crypto Narratives
I still haven't found an evergreen way to express the long $BTC / short altcoins trade without taking the risk of a substantial drawdown on these moves
I setup a long BTC / short alts strategy on a small sub-account as an experiment and it looked like that

- Long BTC leg around 2x larger than the shorts => I started with 1.5x but that's clearly too low imo

- Short more than 100 alts (so very diluted shorts), with almost all of them being sub $1bn FDV

- I doubled down on some of the shorts when the alts started moving up in early May, which is probably not a good idea because I often doubled down way too early on altcoins that ended up being the top performers (ex: GOAT, PENGU, PNUT). This means that the shorts with the most size were also the shorts pumping the most, increasing the negative uPnL a lot on these.

- This previous point leads me to think that keeping equal size (or close to) on most shorts and not adding on the ones that pumped the most is probably a better strategy. Losers remain losers.

- You can see that the drawdown in May was pretty brutal, but it's been very smooth since then. Finding how to reduce this drawdown is key.
25🔥11👍4


>>Click here to continue<<

Crypto Narratives







Share with your best friend
VIEW MORE

United States America Popular Telegram Group (US)


Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /var/www/hottg/function.php on line 115

Fatal error: Uncaught mysqli_sql_exception: Too many connections in /var/www/db.php:16 Stack trace: #0 /var/www/db.php(16): mysqli_connect() #1 /var/www/hottg/function.php(212): db() #2 /var/www/hottg/function.php(115): select() #3 /var/www/hottg/post.php(351): daCache() #4 /var/www/hottg/route.php(63): include_once('...') #5 {main} thrown in /var/www/db.php on line 16