Channel: Robert W Malone, MD
WHO International Health Regulations
In a frantic last minute rush, modified IHR were illegally approved by the most recent World Health Assembly (#77)
#WHA77 @ WHO @ DrTedros
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/who-international-health-regulations
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
In a frantic last minute rush, modified IHR were illegally approved by the most recent World Health Assembly (#77)
#WHA77 @ WHO @ DrTedros
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/who-international-health-regulations
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Who is Robert Malone
WHO International Health Regulations
In a frantic last minute rush, modified IHR were illegally approved by the most recent World Health Assembly (#77)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Battle of Evermore
Observations from Globalism Central
We are in Geneva, the international capital of Globalism.
We all sense an impending battle. But do we know who is friend and who is foe?
Do we understand our allies as well as our opponents?
Simple stereotypes will not lead to victory.
Both sides think that they represent the future. Both sides think they are battling evil to save the world.
All passionately believe that they fight for the common good.
On one side, with a sense of noblesse oblige, a transnational elite works to advance a unified, globalized, centralized political and economic world order. A world order based on a command economy rooted in massive databases, predictive artificial intelligence-driven decision making and the merging of man and machine to create a new species.
Fulfilling this objective is believed to require universal surveillance, propaganda powered by modern psychology, algorithmic censorship, cultural homogenization, and centralized automated economic controls and resource allocation.
I believe that this will be a digital, technocratic and bureaucratic hell. I believe that Yeats’ Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, now slouches towards Geneva to be born. I believe in humanity. And I believe in the divine.
Our side believes in the pragmatic benefits of the Principal of Subsidiarity; Decision making at the most local competent politically representative structure. We believe in decentralization, nationalism, unique cultural identities, individual and national sovereignty, and the power of human innovation.
Centralized planning and control destroys the ability of individuals, cultures, and nations to innovate. Globalized, centralized planning and control will kill the motivation and ability of the human race to adapt to changing conditions. After the Soviet Union and so many others, do we really need another example before we can learn this lesson? Or does each era need to recycle history?
Elevating a new global centralized nobility will not lead to prosperity, innovation, and effective adaptation; it will destroy these things. We have seen the failure of this model over the last few years of the COVIDcrisis. How many more examples do we need?
I believe in the power of diversified independent thought, cultural heritage, and freedom.
In this battle, I do not know which vision will prevail.
What I do know is that old imperialistic models are outdated, and old empires and old ways of geopolitical thinking face imminent collapse. But they will not go quietly into the night.
And what I am absolutely sure of is that censorship will not save this version of imperialism currently hiding behind the weaponized propaganda term “Democracy”.
And that the weaponization of fear of infectious disease to control human behavior is ethically evil, and that those who deploy these unethical practices to advance their objectives of political power, profit and control should be shamed and condemned. The use of psychological bioterrorism is wrong, and it must stop.
For the sake of our children, we must oppose both Transhumanism and weaponized fear.
And we must insist on freedom, Dammit.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Observations from Globalism Central
We are in Geneva, the international capital of Globalism.
We all sense an impending battle. But do we know who is friend and who is foe?
Do we understand our allies as well as our opponents?
Simple stereotypes will not lead to victory.
Both sides think that they represent the future. Both sides think they are battling evil to save the world.
All passionately believe that they fight for the common good.
On one side, with a sense of noblesse oblige, a transnational elite works to advance a unified, globalized, centralized political and economic world order. A world order based on a command economy rooted in massive databases, predictive artificial intelligence-driven decision making and the merging of man and machine to create a new species.
Fulfilling this objective is believed to require universal surveillance, propaganda powered by modern psychology, algorithmic censorship, cultural homogenization, and centralized automated economic controls and resource allocation.
I believe that this will be a digital, technocratic and bureaucratic hell. I believe that Yeats’ Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, now slouches towards Geneva to be born. I believe in humanity. And I believe in the divine.
Our side believes in the pragmatic benefits of the Principal of Subsidiarity; Decision making at the most local competent politically representative structure. We believe in decentralization, nationalism, unique cultural identities, individual and national sovereignty, and the power of human innovation.
Centralized planning and control destroys the ability of individuals, cultures, and nations to innovate. Globalized, centralized planning and control will kill the motivation and ability of the human race to adapt to changing conditions. After the Soviet Union and so many others, do we really need another example before we can learn this lesson? Or does each era need to recycle history?
Elevating a new global centralized nobility will not lead to prosperity, innovation, and effective adaptation; it will destroy these things. We have seen the failure of this model over the last few years of the COVIDcrisis. How many more examples do we need?
I believe in the power of diversified independent thought, cultural heritage, and freedom.
In this battle, I do not know which vision will prevail.
What I do know is that old imperialistic models are outdated, and old empires and old ways of geopolitical thinking face imminent collapse. But they will not go quietly into the night.
And what I am absolutely sure of is that censorship will not save this version of imperialism currently hiding behind the weaponized propaganda term “Democracy”.
And that the weaponization of fear of infectious disease to control human behavior is ethically evil, and that those who deploy these unethical practices to advance their objectives of political power, profit and control should be shamed and condemned. The use of psychological bioterrorism is wrong, and it must stop.
For the sake of our children, we must oppose both Transhumanism and weaponized fear.
And we must insist on freedom, Dammit.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
The liberal trollery supporting Saint Fauci are crawling all over Twitter comments sections today.
It must have something to do with Saint Fauci's Congressional hearing that starts in less than ten minutes!
Their gangstalking knows no bounds!
The link to the live testimony is in the comments.
---
For those who wish to watch the proceedings:
https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/a-hearing-with-dr-anthony-fauci/
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
It must have something to do with Saint Fauci's Congressional hearing that starts in less than ten minutes!
Their gangstalking knows no bounds!
The link to the live testimony is in the comments.
---
For those who wish to watch the proceedings:
https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/a-hearing-with-dr-anthony-fauci/
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
As I am reading the posts and comments by liberal sycophants for Saint Fauci, I am struck that mass formation has again sickened the easily hypnotized progressive left.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
THE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ARE INVALID AND MUST BE REJECTED
By Reggie Littlejohn
The fact that the WHO has passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations is appalling on several fronts.
The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO’s own rules. Under Article 55 of the International Health Regulations, “The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.” That deadline passed on January 27, 2024.
In defiance of this requirement, the WHO negotiated the draft Amendments until the last minute, releasing the final text just hours before the final vote. This violation prevented governments and civil society from being able to analyze this document and discern its implications. The WHO’s tossing out of its own rule indicates its disregard for the rule of law. If it is willing to disregard such an important safeguard as Article 55, what is stopping it from disregarding any other provision in the IHRs? If it is willing to ignore its own laws, why would we expect it to honor ours? For this reason, The Amendments to the IHR are invalid and should be rejected.
Further, the Amendments that passed on June 2 retain troubling language regarding censorship. These provisions have been buried in Annex 1,A.2.c., which requires State Parties to “develop, strengthen and maintain core capacities . . . in relation to . . . surveillance . . . and risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation.” The requirement that nations “address” “misinformation and disinformation” is fraught with opportunities for abuse. None of these terms is defined in the document. Does “addressing” it mean censoring it, and possibly punishing those who have offered divergent opinions?
We have already seen how doctors and scientists who disagreed with the WHO narrative under Covid 19 were censored for their views – views that turned out to be true. Some who offered protocols not recommended by the WHO even had their licenses to practice medicine threatened or suspended. How much worse will this censorship be if it is baked in as a requirement to the International Health Regulations?
The “surveillance” requirement does not specify what is to be surveilled. The IHR amendments, however, should be read together with the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which the WHO is continuing to negotiate. Article 5 of the most recent draft of the Treaty sets forth the “One Health Approach,” which connects and balances human, animal, plant and environmental health, giving a pretext for surveillance on all these fronts.
Meanwhile, Article 4: Pandemic Prevention and Public Health Surveillance, states:2 bis. The Parties recognize that environmental, climatic, social, anthropogenic [climate change caused by people], and economic factors increase the risk of pandemics and endeavor to identify these factors and take them into consideration in the development and implementation of relevant policies . . .” Through the “One Health” approach, the WHO is asserting its authority over all aspects of life on earth, all of which will be surveilled.
It is also concerning that the IHR Amendments mention “pandemic emergency” 16 times. “Pandemic emergency” is a euphemism for a potential pandemic. See Article 1, Definitions. The Amendments to the IHR expand the WHO’s authority beyond actual pandemics to potential pandemics – as decided by the Director General.👇 👇
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
By Reggie Littlejohn
The fact that the WHO has passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations is appalling on several fronts.
The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO’s own rules. Under Article 55 of the International Health Regulations, “The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.” That deadline passed on January 27, 2024.
In defiance of this requirement, the WHO negotiated the draft Amendments until the last minute, releasing the final text just hours before the final vote. This violation prevented governments and civil society from being able to analyze this document and discern its implications. The WHO’s tossing out of its own rule indicates its disregard for the rule of law. If it is willing to disregard such an important safeguard as Article 55, what is stopping it from disregarding any other provision in the IHRs? If it is willing to ignore its own laws, why would we expect it to honor ours? For this reason, The Amendments to the IHR are invalid and should be rejected.
Further, the Amendments that passed on June 2 retain troubling language regarding censorship. These provisions have been buried in Annex 1,A.2.c., which requires State Parties to “develop, strengthen and maintain core capacities . . . in relation to . . . surveillance . . . and risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation.” The requirement that nations “address” “misinformation and disinformation” is fraught with opportunities for abuse. None of these terms is defined in the document. Does “addressing” it mean censoring it, and possibly punishing those who have offered divergent opinions?
We have already seen how doctors and scientists who disagreed with the WHO narrative under Covid 19 were censored for their views – views that turned out to be true. Some who offered protocols not recommended by the WHO even had their licenses to practice medicine threatened or suspended. How much worse will this censorship be if it is baked in as a requirement to the International Health Regulations?
The “surveillance” requirement does not specify what is to be surveilled. The IHR amendments, however, should be read together with the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which the WHO is continuing to negotiate. Article 5 of the most recent draft of the Treaty sets forth the “One Health Approach,” which connects and balances human, animal, plant and environmental health, giving a pretext for surveillance on all these fronts.
Meanwhile, Article 4: Pandemic Prevention and Public Health Surveillance, states:2 bis. The Parties recognize that environmental, climatic, social, anthropogenic [climate change caused by people], and economic factors increase the risk of pandemics and endeavor to identify these factors and take them into consideration in the development and implementation of relevant policies . . .” Through the “One Health” approach, the WHO is asserting its authority over all aspects of life on earth, all of which will be surveilled.
It is also concerning that the IHR Amendments mention “pandemic emergency” 16 times. “Pandemic emergency” is a euphemism for a potential pandemic. See Article 1, Definitions. The Amendments to the IHR expand the WHO’s authority beyond actual pandemics to potential pandemics – as decided by the Director General.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Robert W Malone, MD
THE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ARE INVALID AND MUST BE REJECTED By Reggie Littlejohn The fact that the WHO has passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations is appalling on…
Robert W Malone, MD, [04.06.2024 1:55]
THE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ARE INVALID AND MUST BE REJECTED
By Reggie Littlejohn
The fact that the WHO has passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations is appalling on several fronts.
The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO’s own rules. Under Article 55 of the International Health Regulations, “The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.” That deadline passed on January 27, 2024.
In defiance of this requirement, the WHO negotiated the draft Amendments until the last minute, releasing the final text just hours before the final vote. This violation prevented governments and civil society from being able to analyze this document and discern its implications. The WHO’s tossing out of its own rule indicates its disregard for the rule of law. If it is willing to disregard such an important safeguard as Article 55, what is stopping it from disregarding any other provision in the IHRs? If it is willing to ignore its own laws, why would we expect it to honor ours? For this reason, The Amendments to the IHR are invalid and should be rejected.
Further, the Amendments that passed on June 2 retain troubling language regarding censorship. These provisions have been buried in Annex 1,A.2.c., which requires State Parties to “develop, strengthen and maintain core capacities . . . in relation to . . . surveillance . . . and risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation.” The requirement that nations “address” “misinformation and disinformation” is fraught with opportunities for abuse. None of these terms is defined in the document. Does “addressing” it mean censoring it, and possibly punishing those who have offered divergent opinions?
We have already seen how doctors and scientists who disagreed with the WHO narrative under Covid 19 were censored for their views – views that turned out to be true. Some who offered protocols not recommended by the WHO even had their licenses to practice medicine threatened or suspended. How much worse will this censorship be if it is baked in as a requirement to the International Health Regulations?
The “surveillance” requirement does not specify what is to be surveilled. The IHR amendments, however, should be read together with the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which the WHO is continuing to negotiate. Article 5 of the most recent draft of the Treaty sets forth the “One Health Approach,” which connects and balances human, animal, plant and environmental health, giving a pretext for surveillance on all these fronts.
Meanwhile, Article 4: Pandemic Prevention and Public Health Surveillance, states:2 bis. The Parties recognize that environmental, climatic, social, anthropogenic [climate change caused by people], and economic factors increase the risk of pandemics and endeavor to identify these factors and take them into consideration in the development and implementation of relevant policies . . .” Through the “One Health” approach, the WHO is asserting its authority over all aspects of life on earth, all of which will be surveilled.
It is also concerning that the IHR Amendments mention “pandemic emergency” 16 times. “Pandemic emergency” is a euphemism for a potential pandemic. See Article 1, Definitions. The Amendments to the IHR expand the WHO’s authority beyond actual pandemics to potential pandemics – as decided by the Director General.
It is also troubling that the words, “prepare” or “preparedness” are used nine additional times in the Amended IHRs as compared with the 2005 IHRs. This repeated emphasis on preparedness expands the authority of the WHO from response during a pandemic to times between pandemics. Since nations must always be in a state of preparedness, the WHO will be exercising its expanded authority in perpetuity.
THE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ARE INVALID AND MUST BE REJECTED
By Reggie Littlejohn
The fact that the WHO has passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations is appalling on several fronts.
The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO’s own rules. Under Article 55 of the International Health Regulations, “The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.” That deadline passed on January 27, 2024.
In defiance of this requirement, the WHO negotiated the draft Amendments until the last minute, releasing the final text just hours before the final vote. This violation prevented governments and civil society from being able to analyze this document and discern its implications. The WHO’s tossing out of its own rule indicates its disregard for the rule of law. If it is willing to disregard such an important safeguard as Article 55, what is stopping it from disregarding any other provision in the IHRs? If it is willing to ignore its own laws, why would we expect it to honor ours? For this reason, The Amendments to the IHR are invalid and should be rejected.
Further, the Amendments that passed on June 2 retain troubling language regarding censorship. These provisions have been buried in Annex 1,A.2.c., which requires State Parties to “develop, strengthen and maintain core capacities . . . in relation to . . . surveillance . . . and risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation.” The requirement that nations “address” “misinformation and disinformation” is fraught with opportunities for abuse. None of these terms is defined in the document. Does “addressing” it mean censoring it, and possibly punishing those who have offered divergent opinions?
We have already seen how doctors and scientists who disagreed with the WHO narrative under Covid 19 were censored for their views – views that turned out to be true. Some who offered protocols not recommended by the WHO even had their licenses to practice medicine threatened or suspended. How much worse will this censorship be if it is baked in as a requirement to the International Health Regulations?
The “surveillance” requirement does not specify what is to be surveilled. The IHR amendments, however, should be read together with the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which the WHO is continuing to negotiate. Article 5 of the most recent draft of the Treaty sets forth the “One Health Approach,” which connects and balances human, animal, plant and environmental health, giving a pretext for surveillance on all these fronts.
Meanwhile, Article 4: Pandemic Prevention and Public Health Surveillance, states:2 bis. The Parties recognize that environmental, climatic, social, anthropogenic [climate change caused by people], and economic factors increase the risk of pandemics and endeavor to identify these factors and take them into consideration in the development and implementation of relevant policies . . .” Through the “One Health” approach, the WHO is asserting its authority over all aspects of life on earth, all of which will be surveilled.
It is also concerning that the IHR Amendments mention “pandemic emergency” 16 times. “Pandemic emergency” is a euphemism for a potential pandemic. See Article 1, Definitions. The Amendments to the IHR expand the WHO’s authority beyond actual pandemics to potential pandemics – as decided by the Director General.
It is also troubling that the words, “prepare” or “preparedness” are used nine additional times in the Amended IHRs as compared with the 2005 IHRs. This repeated emphasis on preparedness expands the authority of the WHO from response during a pandemic to times between pandemics. Since nations must always be in a state of preparedness, the WHO will be exercising its expanded authority in perpetuity.
Robert W Malone, MD
THE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ARE INVALID AND MUST BE REJECTED By Reggie Littlejohn The fact that the WHO has passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations is appalling on…
Regarding the IHR, Article 35 details the requirements of “Health Documents,” including those in digital format. The system of digital health documents is consistent with, and in my opinion a precursor to, the Digital IDs described by the World Economic Forum. According to the attached WEF Chart, people will need a Digital ID to:
~Access healthcare insurance and treatment
~Open bank accounts and carry out online transactions
~Travel
~Access Humanitarian Services
~Shop and conduct business transactions
~Participate in social media
~Pay taxes, vote, collect government benefits
~Own a communication device [such as a cell phone or a computer]
In other words, individuals will need Digital IDs to access almost every aspect of civilized society.
All of our actions, taken with the use of Digital IDs, will be tracked and traced. If we step out of line, we can be punished by, for example, being severed from our bank accounts and credit cards – similar to what happened to the Canadian Truckers. Digital IDs are a form of mass surveillance and totalitarian control.
These Digital IDs are currently being rolled out by the World Health Organization in collaboration with the European Union.
The IHR Amendments, taken together with the impending Pandemic Treaty, will usher in a global, totalitarian bio-tech surveillance police state. Their adoption just hours after their disclosure is invalid and must be rejected.
CONTACT: Reggie Littlejohn; [email protected],
Founder and president,
Anti-Globalist International;
Co-Chair, Sovereignty Coalition
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
~Access healthcare insurance and treatment
~Open bank accounts and carry out online transactions
~Travel
~Access Humanitarian Services
~Shop and conduct business transactions
~Participate in social media
~Pay taxes, vote, collect government benefits
~Own a communication device [such as a cell phone or a computer]
In other words, individuals will need Digital IDs to access almost every aspect of civilized society.
All of our actions, taken with the use of Digital IDs, will be tracked and traced. If we step out of line, we can be punished by, for example, being severed from our bank accounts and credit cards – similar to what happened to the Canadian Truckers. Digital IDs are a form of mass surveillance and totalitarian control.
These Digital IDs are currently being rolled out by the World Health Organization in collaboration with the European Union.
The IHR Amendments, taken together with the impending Pandemic Treaty, will usher in a global, totalitarian bio-tech surveillance police state. Their adoption just hours after their disclosure is invalid and must be rejected.
CONTACT: Reggie Littlejohn; [email protected],
Founder and president,
Anti-Globalist International;
Co-Chair, Sovereignty Coalition
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Whether or not Fauci personally received royalties from the C-19 patents, as director at NIAID, he would have had complete control over how that money was allocated and what projects it was spent on; including his enormous PR office staff, security detail, office, travel, etc. The bulk of the money did not go to individual royalty payments but to the institute itself.
So, yes- he personally would have benefited from those hundreds of millions allocated to NIAID.
---
Whether or not he personally received royalties, as director at NIAID, he had complete control over how that money was allocated and what projects it was spent on, including his enormous PR office, security detail, and travel.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
So, yes- he personally would have benefited from those hundreds of millions allocated to NIAID.
---
Whether or not he personally received royalties, as director at NIAID, he had complete control over how that money was allocated and what projects it was spent on, including his enormous PR office, security detail, and travel.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Even if the deer are out of control, I live in a paradise.
Jill and I are both super glad to be home from the European trip and then DC yesterday.
This week, the Epoch Times Fallout crew is here to film more farm episodes. It should be fun!
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Jill and I are both super glad to be home from the European trip and then DC yesterday.
This week, the Epoch Times Fallout crew is here to film more farm episodes. It should be fun!
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/6721819754.html
The WHO's Power Grab Must Be Rejected
NEWS PROVIDED BY
Anti-Globalist International
June 3, 2024
GENEVA, June 3, 2024 /Standard Newswire/ -- Reggie Littlejohn, Founder and President of Women's Rights Without Frontiers, releases the following and is available for comment:
Late Saturday, June 1, the WHO passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations. This act is appalling on several fronts.
The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO's own rules. Under Article 55 of the International Health Regulations, "The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration." That deadline passed on January 27, 2024.
In defiance of this requirement, the WHO negotiated the draft Amendments until the last minute, releasing the final text just hours before the final vote.
This violation prevented governments and civil society from being able to analyze this document and discern its implications.
The WHO's tossing out of its own rule indicates its disregard for the rule of law. If it is willing to disregard such an important safeguard as Article 55, what is stopping it from disregarding any other provision in the IHRs? If it is willing to ignore its own laws, why would we expect it to honor ours?
For this reason, The Amendments to the IHR are invalid and should be rejected.
Further, the Amendments that passed on June 2 retain troubling language regarding censorship. These provisions have been buried in Annex 1,A.2.c., which requires State Parties to "develop, strengthen and maintain core capacities . . . in relation to . . . surveillance . . . and risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation."
The requirement that nations "address" "misinformation and disinformation" is fraught with opportunities for abuse. None of these terms is defined in the document. Does "addressing" it mean censoring it, and possibly punishing those who have offered divergent opinions? We have already seen how doctors and scientists who disagreed with the WHO narrative under Covid 19 were censored for their views – views that turned out to be true. Some who offered protocols not recommended by the WHO even had their licenses to practice medicine threatened or suspended. How much worse will this censorship be if it is baked in as a requirement to the International Health Regulations?
The "surveillance" requirement does not specify what is to be surveilled. The IHR amendments, however, should be read together with the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which the WHO is continuing to negotiate. Article 5 of the most recent draft of the Treaty sets forth the "One Health Approach," which connects and balances human, animal, plant and environmental health, giving a pretext for surveillance on all these fronts.
Meanwhile, Article 4: Pandemic Prevention and Public Health Surveillance, states:
2 bis. The Parties recognize that environmental, climatic, social, anthropogenic [climate change caused by people], and economic factors increase the risk of pandemics and endeavor to identify these factors and take them into consideration in the development and implementation of relevant policies . . .
Through the "One Health" approach, the WHO is asserting its authority over all aspects of life on earth, all of which will be surveilled.👇 👇
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
The WHO's Power Grab Must Be Rejected
NEWS PROVIDED BY
Anti-Globalist International
June 3, 2024
GENEVA, June 3, 2024 /Standard Newswire/ -- Reggie Littlejohn, Founder and President of Women's Rights Without Frontiers, releases the following and is available for comment:
Late Saturday, June 1, the WHO passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations. This act is appalling on several fronts.
The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO's own rules. Under Article 55 of the International Health Regulations, "The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration." That deadline passed on January 27, 2024.
In defiance of this requirement, the WHO negotiated the draft Amendments until the last minute, releasing the final text just hours before the final vote.
This violation prevented governments and civil society from being able to analyze this document and discern its implications.
The WHO's tossing out of its own rule indicates its disregard for the rule of law. If it is willing to disregard such an important safeguard as Article 55, what is stopping it from disregarding any other provision in the IHRs? If it is willing to ignore its own laws, why would we expect it to honor ours?
For this reason, The Amendments to the IHR are invalid and should be rejected.
Further, the Amendments that passed on June 2 retain troubling language regarding censorship. These provisions have been buried in Annex 1,A.2.c., which requires State Parties to "develop, strengthen and maintain core capacities . . . in relation to . . . surveillance . . . and risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation."
The requirement that nations "address" "misinformation and disinformation" is fraught with opportunities for abuse. None of these terms is defined in the document. Does "addressing" it mean censoring it, and possibly punishing those who have offered divergent opinions? We have already seen how doctors and scientists who disagreed with the WHO narrative under Covid 19 were censored for their views – views that turned out to be true. Some who offered protocols not recommended by the WHO even had their licenses to practice medicine threatened or suspended. How much worse will this censorship be if it is baked in as a requirement to the International Health Regulations?
The "surveillance" requirement does not specify what is to be surveilled. The IHR amendments, however, should be read together with the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which the WHO is continuing to negotiate. Article 5 of the most recent draft of the Treaty sets forth the "One Health Approach," which connects and balances human, animal, plant and environmental health, giving a pretext for surveillance on all these fronts.
Meanwhile, Article 4: Pandemic Prevention and Public Health Surveillance, states:
2 bis. The Parties recognize that environmental, climatic, social, anthropogenic [climate change caused by people], and economic factors increase the risk of pandemics and endeavor to identify these factors and take them into consideration in the development and implementation of relevant policies . . .
Through the "One Health" approach, the WHO is asserting its authority over all aspects of life on earth, all of which will be surveilled.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Standardnewswire
The WHO's Power Grab Must Be Rejected - Standard Newswire
Geneva. Late Saturday, June 1, the WHO passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations. This act is appalling on several fronts. The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO’s own rules. Under Article 55 of the International…
Robert W Malone, MD
http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/6721819754.html The WHO's Power Grab Must Be Rejected NEWS PROVIDED BY Anti-Globalist International June 3, 2024 GENEVA, June 3, 2024 /Standard Newswire/ -- Reggie Littlejohn, Founder and President of Women's Rights Without…
Regarding the IHR, Article 35 details the requirements of "Health Documents," including those in digital format. The system of digital health documents is consistent with, and in my opinion a precursor to, the Digital IDs described by the World Economic Forum. According to the attached WEF Chart, people will need a Digital ID to:
Access healthcare insurance and treatment
Open bank accounts and carry out online transactions
Travel
Access Humanitarian Services
Shop and conduct business transactions
Participate in social media
Pay taxes, vote, collect government benefits
Own a communication device [such as a cell phone or a computer]
In other words, individuals will need Digital IDs to access almost every aspect of civilized society. All of our actions, taken with the use of Digital IDs, will be tracked and traced. If we step out of line, we can be punished by, for example, being severed from our bank accounts and credit cards – similar to what happened to the Canadian Truckers. Digital IDs are a form of mass surveillance and totalitarian control.
These Digital IDs are currently being rolled out by the World Health Organization in collaboration with the European Union.
The IHR Amendments, taken together with the impending Pandemic Treaty, will usher in a global, totalitarian bio-tech surveillance police state. Their adoption just hours after their disclosure is invalid and must be rejected.
SOURCE Anti-Globalist International
CONTACT: Reggie Littlejohn, 310-592-5722
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WHO Treaty Dead (for Now). What’s Behind the Quest for a Global Public Health Dictatorship?
An interview with Jason Jones, author of The Great Campaign Against the Great Reset
https://stream.org/who-treaty-dead-for-now-whats-behind-the-quest-for-a-global-public-health-dictatorship/
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
An interview with Jason Jones, author of The Great Campaign Against the Great Reset
https://stream.org/who-treaty-dead-for-now-whats-behind-the-quest-for-a-global-public-health-dictatorship/
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
The Stream
WHO Treaty Dead (for Now). What’s Behind the Quest for a Global Public Health Dictatorship?
The WHO treaty which would have ended national sovereignty and democracy just failed. Who was behind it and why?
Inflation Predicted to Rise Steeply
on consumer goods in the coming year
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/inflation-predicted-to-rise-steeply
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
on consumer goods in the coming year
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/inflation-predicted-to-rise-steeply
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Who is Robert Malone
Inflation Predicted to Rise Steeply
on consumer goods in the coming year
Forwarded from Dr David Martin
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Keep the pressure on @ TuckerCarlson, @ joerogan, @ rustyrockets, @ COVIDSelect
And let's get the crimes prosecuted @ ToddRokitaIN, @ RaulLabrador4ID, @ SeanReyesUT, @ KenPaxtonTX, @ RealAlexJones, @ realDonaldTrump
And let's get the crimes prosecuted @ ToddRokitaIN, @ RaulLabrador4ID, @ SeanReyesUT, @ KenPaxtonTX, @ RealAlexJones, @ realDonaldTrump
Dr. Jessica Rose - National Canadian Citizens Inquiry
Testimony
https://rumble.com/v4yrp8e-dr.-jessica-rose-may-30-2024-regina-saskatchewan.html
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Testimony
https://rumble.com/v4yrp8e-dr.-jessica-rose-may-30-2024-regina-saskatchewan.html
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Rumble
Dr. Jessica Rose - May 30, 2024 - Regina, Saskatchewan
Dr. Rose returns to the National Citizens Inquiry in 2024 to provide another powerful testimony on the mRNA drug platform (more details to come). To view the complete library of Hearings, Witness Test
Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/04/covid-vaccines-may-have-helped-fuel-rise-in-excess-deaths/
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/04/covid-vaccines-may-have-helped-fuel-rise-in-excess-deaths/
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
The Telegraph
Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths
Experts call for more research into side effects and possible links to mortality rates
"Wellness is a Gateway to Right-Wing "Fascism"?
The Guardian's advocacy journalism attacks the physically fit."
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/wellness-is-a-gateway-to-right-wing
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
The Guardian's advocacy journalism attacks the physically fit."
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/wellness-is-a-gateway-to-right-wing
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Interview of Ex-CDC Chief Dr. Robert Redfield
"Reveals COVID-19 Truths"
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/interview-of-ex-cdc-chief-dr-robert
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
"Reveals COVID-19 Truths"
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/interview-of-ex-cdc-chief-dr-robert
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Who is Robert Malone
Interview of Ex-CDC Chief Dr. Robert Redfield
"Reveals COVID-19 Truths"
Univ of Pennsylvania has an H5N1 mRNA vaccine that they are developing rapidly. I fully expect them to roll it out for poultry and cattle ASAP to "prevent its transmission to humans."
So, if you don't want to eat injected meat, start considering buying local meat that has escaped the USDA's notice.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
So, if you don't want to eat injected meat, start considering buying local meat that has escaped the USDA's notice.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
HTML Embed Code: